Education: Beyond Economic Instrumentalism | Farooq Ahmad Bakloo

Education, often heralded as the cornerstone of human development and progress, is increasingly shaped by a narrow vision that prioritizes economic productivity over broader human values. This reductionist view is transforming education into a tool for producing economically viable individuals, neglecting its deeper purpose: to foster well-rounded, civic-minded community builders. This article delves into the critical issues confronting contemporary education systems, including the rise of managerialism, the devaluation of the humanities and social sciences, and the inadequacy in addressing global challenges like climate change and cultural colonization.

Education as an Economic Instrument: A Narrow Vision

The prevailing approach to education positions the human person primarily as an economic being. This utilitarian perspective, which views education as apolitical and neutral, is deeply flawed. It undercuts the role of education in nurturing thoughtful, ethical, and engaged citizens capable of contributing meaningfully to society beyond their economic output. According to Biesta (2010), this instrumentalism "limits the sphere of education to serving the economy, stripping it of its deeper democratic, ethical, and social purposes."
Policies across the globe increasingly reflect managerial, commercial, and state-sponsored ideologies, which deprive educators of their professional autonomy. Instead of fostering critical thinking and creativity, conformity is encouraged within educational systems, undermining the development of initiative and independent thought (Giroux, 2014). This shift reflects a broader neoliberal agenda that frames education as a market commodity rather than a public good (Apple, 2006).

Managerialism and the Erosion of Autonomy

The implementation of managerialism in education has significantly impacted the freedom of teachers and students alike. Nation-states, through their control over curricula and teaching methods, limit the autonomy of educators, reducing them to suppliers of standardized knowledge rather than facilitators of learning. In many cases, the limited freedoms available to educators are underutilized, and educational systems prioritize conformity over innovation. The current emphasis on performance management, proceduralism, over-testing, and metrics-driven approaches creates a culture of surveillance and technocratic efficiencies that stifles genuine learning and critical engagement (Ball, 2013).

The Crisis of Humanities and Social Sciences

A significant casualty of this instrumental approach is the humanities and social sciences. With an undue focus on commercially driven science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) disciplines, education systems minimize attention to the lives of persons and society (Nussbaum, 2010). This imbalance results in a crisis where the humanities and social sciences are undervalued, even though they are crucial for understanding human experience, fostering empathy, and developing a sense of social responsibility. Without these disciplines, education fails to nurture the critical thinking skills needed to navigate a complex and interconnected world (Mourshed, Farrell, & Barton, 2012).

The Rise of Populism and the Threat to Democratic Values

The current educational landscape is also marked by a troubling rise in populism, conspiracy theories, xenophobia, and chauvinistic sentiments. These trends are exacerbated by media platforms that profit from conflict, hate propaganda, and divisive ideologies (Mounk, 2018). Education systems often do not exhibit clear value positions opposing hatred, violence, nationalism, and wars; in some instances, they inadvertently promote them. This lack of moral clarity contributes to a societal climate where democratic principles are eroded, and authoritarianism gains ground (Apple, 2019).

The Failure to Address Fundamental Human Values and Ethics

Education’s failure to address fundamental human values, ethics, and caring is partly due to its grounding in instrumental purposes. This neglect leads to a curriculum that does not prepare students to question the world or engage deeply with the ethical dilemmas they encounter (Freire, 1970). Instead, education systems increasingly function to produce "managed persons" individuals who are trained to conform rather than to think critically or act ethically.

Inadequate Response to Climate and Ecological Crises

Moreover, much of the current education does not respond adequately to the climate and ecological crises. It does not empower students to understand how human-centric activities are destroying other species and the environment, making the Earth uninhabitable (Orr, 1994). There is an urgent need for education systems to integrate ecological literacy and foster an understanding of the interconnectedness of all life forms. As Sterling (2001) notes, "education must transform itself to become the change agent for a sustainable future."

Cultural and Economic Colonization in Education

Cultural and economic colonization continues to manifest in education systems worldwide. Education often reflects linguistic and cultural biases rooted in historical colonization, favoring Enlightenment values of rationalism and scientific reason. This focus on economic reason as the primary driver of progress has rendered education unduly individualistic, present-centered, and limited by an instrumental rationality that separates the human from the non-human world (Shiva, 2005). It overlooks indigenous and early cultural traditions that emphasize community, nature, feelings, and care (Smith, 1999).

Reimagining Education for the Future

To address these multifaceted challenges, education systems must undergo a fundamental transformation. This involves moving beyond an economically driven, managerialist framework toward a model that emphasizes holistic human development. Education must reclaim its role in fostering democratic values, ethical reasoning, and ecological consciousness. It should also resist cultural and economic colonization by incorporating diverse knowledge systems, including indigenous perspectives that prioritize community, sustainability, and care.

Conclusion

The current trajectory of education, with its narrow focus on economic outputs and managerial control, fails to serve its broader purpose of nurturing well-rounded, critically engaged, and ethically grounded individuals. By reimagining education to embrace a more holistic vision — one that values human dignity, ethical responsibility, and ecological sustainability — we can cultivate a generation of learners equipped not only to survive but to thrive in a rapidly changing world.

(Author: Education: Farooq Ahmad Bakloo | Email: farooqmajeed19[at]gmail.com)

References

• Apple, M. W. (2006). Educating the "right" way: Markets, standards, God, and inequality. Routledge.
• Apple, M. W. (2019). Can education change society? Routledge.
• Ball, S. J. (2013). Foucault, power, and education. Routledge.
• Biesta, G. (2010). Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics, democracy. Paradigm Publishers.
• Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum.
• Giroux, H. A. (2014). Neoliberalism’s war on higher education. Haymarket Books.
• Mounk, Y. (2018). The people vs. democracy: Why our freedom is in danger and how to save it. Harvard University Press.
• Mourshed, M., Farrell, D., & Barton, D. (2012). Education to employment: Designing a system that works. McKinsey & Company.
• Nussbaum, M. C. (2010). Not for profit: Why democracy needs the humanities. Princeton University Press.
• Orr, D. W. (1994). Earth in mind: On education, environment, and the human prospect. Island Press.
• Shiva, V. (2005). Earth democracy: Justice, sustainability, and peace. South End Press.
• Smith, L. T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. Zed Books.
• Sterling, S. (2001). Sustainable education: Re-visioning learning and change. Green Books