Home > Archives (2006 on) > 2018 > Colonial Discourse in Kashmir: Revisiting the Role of Robert (...)

Mainstream, VOL LVI No 47 New Delhi November 10, 2018

Colonial Discourse in Kashmir: Revisiting the Role of Robert Thorp

Monday 12 November 2018

by Mohammad Ashraf Khwaja

Robert Thorp, a British Army officer, is believed to have visited Kashmir as a tourist in 1865 when Maharaja Ranbir Singh was the ruler of the state. A theory is being developed by some ‘Thorp sympathisers’ that he was allegedly murdered in November 1868 by the forces of Ranbir Singh for his crime of speaking against the Dogra autocracy. It is said that his mother was a Kashmiri Muslim woman who had been married to E. Thorp after the latter converted to Islam. Robert Thorp’s visit to Kashmir was based in the backdrop of his mother’s woeful stories about Kashmir. All this made him to visit Kashmir in 1865 when the young Thorp was just 27 years old. During Thorp’s stay in Kashmir, it is said that he was very critical of the Dogra Government for their brutal policies towards the Kashmiris. It is believed that he wrote occasionally in the British newspapers against the Dogra oppression imposed on the Kashmiris. His writings were later published in a book Cashmere Misgovernment in 1870 by the Mission Society of England.

In the whole discourse if an objective study would be made, we will find that ‘historical claims’ are not as simple as they are being represented. Firstly, it is still a mystery and very much debatable whether Robert Thorp was murdered or died a natural death. Some believe that Thorp was poisoned and others refer to strangulation as the reason for his death. The report of Dr Caylay, the Ladakh agent who was in Srinagar then, nullifies the whole murder discourse; he reported ‘rapture of heart’ as the cause of Thorp’s death. Despite the lack of conclusive and reliable historical accounts about the cause of Thorp’s death, there is section of people in Kashmir who conveniently call his death a conspiratorial murder. Secondly, a historical discourse is being built on the part of some writers in Kashmir by calling Thorp’s untimely death as tantamount to losing a saviour of Kashmiris. One fails to comprehend how a person could be a saviour of Kashmir when he never spoke of its independence but always insisted that the British should intervene in the state’s affairs. Mr Thorp had obviously reprimanded the British Government for selling Kashmir to the Dogras but indirectly pleaded that Kashmir should have been ruled by the British themselves, therefore, wanting amelio-ration of the Kashmiris’ pathetic condition within British imperialism. This attitude of the so-called first martyr leads us to believe that he was either unimpressed by the cheap bargain of Kashmir by his masters (British) or was foreseeing Kashmir as an abode for missionary work which was curtailed by the Dogra rulers.

Mr Thorp was more concerned for the British Empire than the Kashmiris. There is, however, no denying the fact that Thorp having his roots from his mother’s side in Kashmir was relatively sympathetic to the Kashmiris but one cannot outrightly absolve him from his sympathy towards imperialistic motives.

Why was Thorp tasked to write against Dogra oppression? This is a million dollar question. The British actually were consolidating their position in Punjab after they defeated them and once they controlled it, they were foreseeing the Russian expansion in Central Asia as a potential threat. Therefore the Britishers developed a new interest in J&K and were deliberating on how to get a pretext for intervention. For this imperialistic purpose, they dispatched a fact-finding mission to Kashmir which included some Army officers and Christian missionaries. Robert Thorp was incidentally one of them.

Thorp’s eighty-page book Cashmere Misgovern-ment cannot be taken as the gospel truth when there are other primary and secondary sources available to substantiate the historical facts. For instance, if the same book is being read in an objective way one could normally extract that his preparing a detailed account of sufferings and miseries of Kashmiris was merely a pretext for the British intervention of Kashmir which actually happened soon after the death of R. Thorp. Yes, barely after a decade or so, the British Government appointed an English resident at Srinagar in 1885 soon after which the third ruler of Dogra dynasty, Maharaja Pratap Singh, was deposed. Dr Sheikh Showkat Hussain, the Kashmir-based political activist and scholar, argues, ‘Robert Thorp’s book was a product of his commitment to the expansion of the British Empire.’

Indeed, the objective of Thorp’s work achieved to a great extent the reason for which it was written when the second Dogra ruler Ranbir Singh was coerced to accept a British resident in Kashmir who safeguarded imperial interests in the state. Robert Thorp’s elevation as the sympathetic saviour of Kashmiris or for that matter to consider him the first martyr of Kashmir is a brazen attempt to belittle the role of the indigenous Shaheed Gunj martyrs of 1846 and poor shawl weavers who laid down their lives protesting against the excesses of the Dogra autocracy in Zaldagar in 1865, long before Robert Thorp died as a so-called first martyr. The league of Thorp-admirers selectively prefers to undermine the role of Sheikh Imam-ud-Din and his followers who fought against the Dogras to secure freedom for the Kashmiris much before in 1846.

Disregarding the contribution of local shawl weavers, artisans and labourers and exagge-rating Mr Thorp who wasn’t in principle against occupation per se is a case of distorting history. Since Robert Thorp’s 150th death anniversary is all set to be observed by our civil society and writers on November 22 this year, I wish humbly to remind them that intellectual honesty demands not to manufacture heroes in fanciful imagination but to locate them painstakingly in true archival accounts.

Bottom-line: Kashmir has seen many tragedies; scripting a distorted history is just another tragedy.

The author is a Ph.D. Research Scholar, Centre of Advanced Study, Department of History, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh.

Notice: The print edition of Mainstream Weekly is now discontinued & only an online edition is appearing. No subscriptions are being accepted