Mainstream Weekly

Home > Archives (2006 on) > 2010 > Delaying Enactment of Law on ‘Honour’ Killing

Mainstream, Vol XLVIII, No 51, December 11, 2010

Delaying Enactment of Law on ‘Honour’ Killing

Sunday 12 December 2010

#socialtags

by M.S. Jaglan

There is a growing concern among the liberal minded individuals, social and democratic organisations and even international institutions on the rising trend of brutal killings of innocent youngsters in the name of family or clan honour in India. The United Nations also takes a very serious view of such heinous crimes. The naked brutality of such acts against women is in contravention of the spirit of the ’United Nations Convention on the Elimination of all forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW)’ which has been duly signed and ratified by India. The prevalence and entrenchment of the caste system and rabid patriarchal ethos in the society at large are the root cause of this social evil. The Supreme Court of India, in its observation in the case of Lata Singh versus State of Uttar Pradesh and others in 2006, termed the caste system as a curse on the nation and acknowledged that inter-caste marriages are in the national interest as they will result in destroying the caste system. Referring to ’honour’ killings the Apex Court stated: "There is nothing honourable in such killings, and in fact they are nothing but barbaric and shameful acts of murder committed by brutal, feudal minded persons who deserve harsh punishment."

Recent months in the country have witnessed a spate of ’honour’ killings. Taking cognisance of these incidents the Supreme Court on June 10, 2010 issued a notice to the Central Government and nine State governments to know about the steps taken to curb such violence. The Union Government constituted a group of nine Ministers to look into the possibility of framing a separate law to deal with the menace of ’honour’ killings. Interestingly, so far only one State Government, that of Rajasthan, has dared to exhibit political will to catch the bull by the horns. In an affidavit to the Supreme Court, the Rajasthan Government is reported to have committed to booking the perpetrators of this crime, including the Khap Panchayat members, under the National Security Law and Goonda Act. It has also directed the police officials to keep a tab on the panches of such organisations. But neither the spirit of the Apex Court’s intervention nor the plea of the women organisations could result in the MPs’ comprehending the urgency to enact an effective law dealing with this social evil during the monsoon session of Parliament. The Central Government seems to be dithering under the pressure of Khap Panchayats and the political class that always aspires for the support of such patriarchal forums. The pertinent question that agitates the mind of conscious people is: how long are we to witness this medieval barbaric practice and the stonewalling of the proposed legislation by its practitioners?

•

IN Haryana, where ’honour’ killings have hogged the headlines in newspapers more frequently than in other States, the ruling as well as Opposition political parties, with the lone exception of the Left organisations, seem to be engaged in shielding the medieval institution of Khap Panchayats from the clutches of the proposed law on ’honour killings’. It is being suggested that ’honour’ killing is not the outcome of the gender bias attitude of the Khap Panchayats because in most cases the family members of the girl, including women, are the perpetrators of the crime. But the fact of the matter is that the ideology of the so-called family or clan honour is derived from the gender role assigned by patriarchy. The women who do not follow the socially acceptable behaviour or preserve their chastity have to bear the brunt in the form of violence, coercion and killings to restore the family ’honour’. And it is an open secret that Khap Panchayats are the functional forums of patriarchy in the State and surrounding areas. There are numerous examples in Haryana and western Uttar Pradesh where these medieval institutions have directly or indirectly precipitated situations leading to cold-blooded murders of young women and men defying the age-old established value system.

The debate on enactment of the law is also being trivialised on the ground that ’honour’ killing is, after all, a murder and the perpetrators of this crime can be tried under the existing provisions of the IPC. But it is not a case of simple murder. It is a social evil no less in enormity than sati, dowry deaths and atrocities against Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. It is difficult to quantify, but India is counted among the countries (Pakistan, Iraq, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan and Iran being others) having very high per capita incidents of ’honour’ killings in the world. We have the Commission of Sati (Prevention) Act, 1987; Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 (amended in 1983 and 1986); and Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 to deal with the social evils listed earlier. Then why not a stand-alone law to deal with ’honour’ killing which shames the civil society and silences forever the women and youth who dare to dream differently?

The Khap Panchayats and their supporters have raised dissenting voices against the enactment of a comprehensive law on ’honour’ killings. This is understandable as these extra-constitutional and mob-gathering forums have always considered themselves above the law of the land. The proposed Act for the abatement of ’honour killings’ has to be quite stringent whereby the perpetrators of the crime shall get life imprisonment or capital punishment and the institutions and individuals aiding and abetting such killings shall also get deterrent punishment. The new law should target the perpetrators and abettors of the crime as in the case of the Commission of Sati (Prevention) Act, 1987.

The time has come when all those who are organically attached to the ideals of secular and liberal values intervene to stop such ghastly murders of young people. They have to press for the enactment of a law today; they will have to strive for its implementation tomorrow. The task is not impossible but it will be a long-drawn-out battle.

Dr M.S. Jaglan is an Associate Professor, Department of Geography, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra (Haryana). He can be contacted at e-mail: mahabirsj@rediffmail.com

ISSN (Mainstream Online) : 2582-7316 | Privacy Policy|
Notice: Mainstream Weekly appears online only.