The Syrian Conflict and the Rise of Extremism: Analyzing the Evolution, Strategies, and Regional Impact of Terrorist Organizations | Abdul Wasi Popalzay

1. Introduction

The Syrian Civil War, which began in 2011, has been a multifaceted conflict characterized by internal strife, foreign interventions, and sectarian divisions. Initially, protests against the Assad regime escalated into a full-scale civil war, leading to a power vacuum that allowed extremist organizations like ISIS (Islamic State of Iraq and Syria) and HTS (Hayat Tahrir al-Sham) to rise to prominence (Khalid, 2022). These groups capitalized on the instability and fragmentation of the Syrian state to establish control over large territories. ISIS, emerging from the Iraqi insurgency, declared a caliphate in 2014, exploiting the conflict to expand its reach and attract foreign fighters, while HTS, initially aligned with al-Qaeda, positioned itself as a dominant Islamist group in the northwestern province of Idlib (Shahab, Sulaiman, & Ullah, 2023). The rise of extremism in Syria, exacerbated by foreign interventions from Russia, the United States, Iran, and Turkey, has had profound implications for regional and global security (Raz, 2023). Understanding the evolution of these extremist groups and their strategies is essential for assessing the broader geopolitical consequences. This study seeks to address three key research questions: how extremist organizations like ISIS and HTS evolved within the context of the Syrian Civil War, what strategies these groups employed to expand their territorial control and influence, and what impact the rise of extremism has had on regional security and political stability in the Middle East. The objectives of the research are to analyze the factors contributing to the rise of these groups, examine the military, ideological, and political strategies used to consolidate their power, and assess the regional consequences of their actions. By exploring these dimensions, the study aims to offer a comprehensive understanding of how extremism has shaped the Syrian conflict and its broader regional and international ramifications. Through this analysis, the study will provide valuable insights into the complex dynamics of the Syrian conflict and inform strategies to counter terrorism and restore stability to the region.

2. The Evolution of Extremist Groups in the Context of the Syrian Civil War

Historical Background: Emergence of Extremist Groups

The Syrian Civil War, which began in 2011, provided fertile ground for the rise of extremist groups like ISIS (Islamic State of Iraq and Syria) and HTS (Hayat Tahrir al-Sham). The collapse of central authority, a breakdown of law and order, and the vacuum created by the absence of effective governance allowed such groups to proliferate. ISIS, initially an offshoot of al-Qaeda in Iraq, capitalized on the chaos in Syria, establishing a presence in 2013 after the group’s leadership decided to expand beyond Iraq’s borders. HTS, formerly the al-Nusra Front, emerged in 2011 as a Syrian branch of al-Qaeda, later distancing itself from al-Qaeda in 2016 to pursue a more Syrian-centric agenda.

The historical context of these groups is tied to the broader regional instability in the Middle East, which was exacerbated by the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003. The resulting power vacuum and the sectarian tensions unleashed in Iraq had a significant influence on Syria’s political landscape. Groups like ISIS built on this by using existing sectarian divides and grievances as a platform for their ideologies, presenting themselves as defenders of Sunni Muslims against perceived Shia oppression, which was encouraged by Iran’s influence in the region (Khaldun, 2022).

The Role of the Syrian Conflict: Fertile Ground for Extremism

The Syrian Civil War provided a unique environment that allowed extremist groups to thrive. The regime of Bashar al-Assad, which struggled to maintain control over various parts of the country, created zones of instability where these groups could operate with relative impunity. Additionally, the conflict led to a massive dislocation of people, economic destruction, and humanitarian crises, creating an ideal recruitment ground for groups like ISIS and HTS, who offered promises of stability, governance, and resistance against foreign and domestic enemies (Zayd, 2023).

Foreign interventions further complicated the situation. Countries like the United States, Russia, Iran, and Turkey all intervened in the conflict, either directly or through proxies, each pursuing their interests. This further fragmented the Syrian conflict, with different factions gaining backing from external powers, which in turn, allowed extremist organizations to gain territory and consolidate power. For instance, ISIS’s rapid expansion was largely facilitated by the power vacuum left by Assad’s forces in certain regions, and foreign-backed rebel groups in the opposition-held areas, which lacked a unified front against these extremists (Siddiqui & Muneer, 2023).

ISIS and HTS: From Origins to Power

ISIS and HTS’s rise can be traced through key leadership and ideological shifts. ISIS’s leader, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, declared the establishment of the "Caliphate" in 2014 after the group seized large parts of Syria and Iraq. The group’s appeal was not only rooted in its military victories but also in its ability to present itself as a Sunni liberation movement. The group’s extremism, however, alienated some factions, and over time, it adopted more brutal tactics, including mass executions, sexual slavery, and the destruction of cultural heritage sites, which led to widespread international condemnation (Abdullah, 2022).

On the other hand, HTS, led by Abu Mohammad al-Julani, initially followed al-Qaeda’s agenda but evolved into a more independent actor by 2016. The group distanced itself from al-Qaeda in part due to its focus on gaining local control in northern Syria, especially Idlib, where it became a dominant force. HTS adopted a more pragmatic approach, attempting to position itself as a defender of Syrian Sunni interests, although its methods remained brutal, including its imposition of Sharia law and violent purges of rival factions (Gul, 2023).

Both groups, though distinct, share similar tactics, leveraging local grievances, sectarianism, and anti-Assad rhetoric to recruit fighters. They capitalized on the weak Syrian state and exploited local dynamics, turning the conflict into a breeding ground for extremism.

Factors Contributing to Extremism

Several factors contributed to the rise of extremism in Syria. These include:

Political Vacuum: The collapse of the central state apparatus left large areas without effective governance. Both ISIS and HTS filled this gap by offering a semblance of order and governance in areas under their control, albeit through oppressive means.

Sectarian Tensions: The long-standing sectarian conflict between Sunni and Shia Muslims in the Middle East provided a foundation for extremist ideologies. ISIS, in particular, capitalized on Sunni grievances, particularly in Iraq, and presented itself as the protector of Sunni interests against the Shia-led governments in both Iraq and Syria, where Iran had significant influence (Ahmed, 2024).

Foreign Interventions: As noted, foreign interventions by multiple states complicated the situation in Syria. These interventions often backed different factions, with Iran and Russia supporting the Assad regime, and the U.S. supporting Kurdish and anti-Assad rebel forces. The fracturing of the opposition to Assad enabled extremist groups to present themselves as viable alternatives to both the Assad regime and the divided opposition factions (Al-Masri, 2023).

Local Grievances: In addition to external factors, local grievances also played a major role in fueling extremism. The Syrian population, especially in areas suffering from prolonged violence, economic hardship, and repression, found the rhetoric of groups like ISIS and HTS appealing. These groups were able to exploit dissatisfaction with the existing political order, recruiting disenfranchised youths who saw no other way to improve their lives (Mozaffar, 2023).

Some scholars argue that the Syrian conflict’s extremism is a result of the broader failure of Middle Eastern governance and the erosion of political structures, rather than the war itself. They suggest that regional issues like the failure of post-colonial states, economic disparities, and global inequalities also contributed to the rise of groups like ISIS. While these factors are indeed important, they fail to capture the centrality of the Syrian conflict and its specific dynamics in creating the conditions for such extremism (Wehrey, 2024).

In rebuttal, it can be argued that the Syrian conflict provided a unique and concentrated context for extremist groups to thrive. Unlike other parts of the Middle East, the absence of a functioning state in Syria for extended periods created an ideal environment for these groups to gain power and influence, with local and global factors intertwining to provide the necessary resources and ideological appeal.

The Syrian Civil War remains a significant contributor to the rise and evolution of extremist groups like ISIS and HTS. The chaos of the conflict, along with foreign interventions and local grievances, created fertile ground for these groups to gain power. While political, sectarian, and local factors contributed to the emergence of extremism, it is clear that the war itself played a pivotal role in enabling such groups to thrive. The historical context, leadership changes, and ideological shifts of these groups highlight the complexity of the Syrian conflict and its broader implications for regional security and stability.

3. Strategies Employed by Terrorist Organizations to Expand Territorial Control and Influence

Terrorist organizations, particularly ISIS (Islamic State of Iraq and Syria) and HTS (Hayat Tahrir al-Sham), employ a range of strategies to expand their territorial control, influence local populations, and gain international prominence. These strategies combine military, ideological, political, and social elements, each complementing the others to create a complex, multifaceted approach to governance and warfare.

Military Tactics: Asymmetrical Warfare, Terror Tactics, and Alliances

ISIS and HTS have both used asymmetrical warfare, terror tactics, and alliances as primary tools for territorial expansion. Asymmetrical warfare refers to strategies where smaller, less-equipped forces engage larger, more powerful adversaries through unconventional methods. For ISIS, this included surprise attacks, ambushes, and guerrilla tactics, which allowed them to fight effectively against both Syrian government forces and the U.S.-backed Kurdish Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) (Al-Masri, 2023). For instance, the 2014 capture of Mosul in Iraq by ISIS marked a turning point in the group’s ability to rapidly seize urban areas, demonstrating their proficiency in such tactics. Their ability to execute sudden, overwhelming attacks allowed them to take control of vast regions in Iraq and Syria, consolidating their self-declared caliphate (Hassan & O’Neill, 2022).

Similarly, HTS, while less internationally focused than ISIS, adopted similar asymmetric tactics, especially in northern Syria. HTS utilized targeted bombings, suicide attacks, and ambushes to weaken opposition forces and the Assad regime’s military capabilities (Gul, 2023). By establishing fortified positions and controlling key routes, HTS managed to consolidate its hold over Idlib and other parts of northwestern Syria, often maintaining influence by engaging in hit-and-run tactics against more powerful adversaries.

Both groups also utilized terror tactics—mass executions, beheadings, and the destruction of cultural heritage sites as part of their strategy to instill fear and deter opposition. The aim of these tactics was to destabilize the region, demoralize the local population, and assert their dominance (Abdullah, 2022). ISIS, in particular, made widespread use of terror to maintain control, with public executions often broadcasted to further their message of dominance.

Ideological and Propaganda Campaigns: Recruitment and International Influence

A key component of ISIS and HTS’s strategies has been the use of ideological and propaganda campaigns to recruit fighters and attract supporters. ISIS effectively used social media platforms, especially Twitter and Telegram, to spread its radical interpretation of Islam and portray itself as a defender of Sunni Muslims against perceived Shia oppression. The group’s propaganda not only justified violent jihad but also presented the idea of the caliphate as a viable alternative to the chaotic, corrupt political structures in the Middle East. These campaigns were highly sophisticated, often featuring slick videos and powerful imagery to appeal to a global audience (Siddiqui & Muneer, 2023). ISIS’s use of propaganda also included the dissemination of online content aimed at encouraging lone-wolf attacks, especially in the West, broadening its reach beyond the Middle East (Al-Masri, 2023).

HTS, although primarily focused on Syria, also employed ideological narratives to justify its actions. The group framed itself as a protector of Syrian Sunnis, resisting both the Assad regime and foreign-backed opposition forces. HTS’s propaganda emphasized its commitment to an Islamic state governed by Sharia law, often contrasting this ideal with the brutality of the Assad regime and the fragmentation caused by other opposition groups. Through this ideological positioning, HTS was able to attract local fighters and secure local legitimacy, especially in areas where other opposition groups had failed to deliver on promises of governance (Gul, 2023).

In both cases, the ideological campaigns served not only as a recruitment tool but also as a method to maintain control over local populations, justifying violence and social repression under the guise of religious and ideological purity. These propaganda efforts created a sense of unity among their followers and reinforced their territorial control.

Political and Social Strategies: Governance and Service Provision

ISIS and HTS adopted similar governance strategies to consolidate power in the territories they controlled. One of the key tactics was the imposition of strict interpretations of Sharia law. ISIS sought to create a "state" governed by its own radical interpretation of Islam, where non-compliance with its rules led to severe punishments, including executions. The group established ministries to manage essential services, such as the provision of food, water, and healthcare, which helped them gain support from the local population in some areas (Hassan & O’Neill, 2022). Despite its brutality, ISIS’s ability to provide some degree of governance, particularly in the early years of its rule, allowed it to present itself as a viable alternative to the unstable regimes in the region.

HTS also imposed Sharia law in areas under its control, with a focus on societal order. While less bureaucratic than ISIS, HTS established a governance framework that included a judicial system based on their interpretation of Islamic law. This system often relied on local councils and tribal leaders to administer justice and resolve conflicts, though it was equally marked by harsh repression, especially against women and minority groups. HTS’s governance strategy emphasized social order, often using religion to legitimize its actions and suppress opposition (Gul, 2023).

Both groups, despite their brutality, also sought to provide basic services—particularly in areas where the state had failed to do so. This was critical in maintaining popular support, as it allowed them to frame their rule as a form of stability amidst the chaos of civil war.

External Support and Alliances: State Actors, Proxies, and Local Communities

The expansion of ISIS and HTS was also facilitated by external support from state actors, proxies, and local communities. ISIS’s rise was significantly bolstered by the support of local Sunni populations in Iraq and Syria, who saw the group as a protector against Shia-dominated governments and foreign intervention. Additionally, ISIS benefited from indirect support from various regional players, particularly in the early years of the Syrian conflict, when some state actors, including Turkey, turned a blind eye to ISIS’s activities, allowing the group to freely cross borders (Zayd, 2023). However, this support waned as ISIS’s brutality and global threat became more apparent, leading to international coalitions aimed at its destruction.

HTS, on the other hand, was supported by Turkey, which provided military aid and logistical support to its forces operating in Syria. This external backing was essential for HTS’s ability to sustain its hold over Idlib and other parts of northwestern Syria, especially as it faced both Syrian government forces and rival jihadist groups. HTS also forged alliances with other local groups to bolster its influence, but its reliance on external state actors, particularly Turkey, made its position more complex compared to ISIS (Gul, 2023).

Some scholars argue that the strategies of these groups are primarily reactive, driven more by external pressures (e.g., airstrikes, local resistance) than by their own proactive plans for expansion. It is true that both ISIS and HTS faced considerable military pressure, especially as international coalitions targeted their strongholds. However, this view fails to recognize the long-term strategic planning and ideological commitment that both groups exhibited in their territorial control efforts. Their use of propaganda, governance structures, and military tactics shows a deliberate attempt to establish and maintain power in a fragmented region.

In conclusion, ISIS and HTS employed a variety of strategies to expand their territorial control and influence. Military tactics, including asymmetrical warfare and terror campaigns, allowed them to seize and maintain power in volatile regions. Their use of ideological and propaganda campaigns helped recruit followers and legitimize their rule, while their governance strategies provided a semblance of order, which garnered local support. External support from state actors and local communities further facilitated their operations, though both groups faced significant challenges due to their brutality and ideological rigidity. Despite these challenges, their ability to adapt to changing circumstances highlights their strategic acumen in the context of the Syrian Civil War.

4. Regional Impact: Security and Political Stability in the Middle East

The Syrian Civil War, exacerbated by the rise of extremism, has had profound and far-reaching effects on the Middle East, influencing neighboring countries, altering the regional balance of power, and posing significant security risks. The involvement of external actors and the emergence of jihadist groups like ISIS have reshaped the geopolitics of the region, creating long-lasting instability.

Impact on Neighboring Countries

The spillover effects of the Syrian conflict have been most felt by Iraq, Lebanon, Jordan, and Turkey. These countries have experienced significant challenges, including refugee crises, military incursions, and the spread of cross-border terrorism.

Iraq has been particularly vulnerable, with ISIS using the instability in Syria to expand its operations into Iraq. The group’s ability to cross the porous border between Syria and Iraq allowed it to capture vast territories, including Mosul, in 2014. This territorial expansion directly influenced the political and security dynamics in Iraq, leading to the displacement of thousands and the re-establishment of a caliphate under ISIS’s banner (Hassan & O’Neill, 2022). The conflict in Syria exacerbated sectarian tensions in Iraq, as Shiite militias supported by Iran fought against Sunni extremist groups. This sectarian violence destabilized Iraq further and disrupted any hope of political reconciliation (Al-Masri, 2023).

Lebanon faced a significant refugee influx due to the Syrian conflict, with over 1 million Syrians seeking asylum by 2020. The overwhelming number of refugees strained Lebanon’s resources and infrastructure, exacerbating existing political and sectarian tensions (Gul, 2023). The Lebanese group Hezbollah, which supports the Assad regime, has also become more involved in Syria, adding complexity to Lebanon’s already fragile political landscape. The presence of armed groups across the border has heightened the risk of cross-border attacks and destabilized the Lebanese security situation.

Jordan shares a lengthy border with Syria and has also been affected by the refugee crisis. In addition to the humanitarian burden, Jordan has had to contend with security threats emanating from ISIS and other jihadist factions. The Kingdom has worked closely with the U.S. and other Western powers to secure its borders and prevent extremist groups from infiltrating its territory (Hassan & O’Neill, 2022). Jordan’s security concerns were further intensified by the military incursions by Syrian and allied forces into areas close to its borders, forcing Jordan to take preemptive measures to safeguard its sovereignty.

Turkey has faced the brunt of both the refugee crisis and the threat of cross-border terrorism. With millions of Syrians fleeing to Turkey, the country became a central player in both the humanitarian crisis and the fight against ISIS. Turkey’s military incursions into northern Syria, particularly against Kurdish forces (whom Turkey sees as linked to the PKK), have complicated its relations with other regional actors, including the U.S. and Russia. These incursions, while aimed at securing Turkey’s border, have also contributed to regional instability, particularly with regard to the Kurdish issue (Gul, 2023).

Foreign Interventions and Influence on the Regional Balance of Power

The Syrian Civil War has attracted interventions from several global powers, each seeking to assert its influence in the region. These interventions have significantly impacted the balance of power in the Middle East, contributing to the rise of extremism and reshaping political dynamics.

The United States has been heavily involved in the conflict, primarily through airstrikes against ISIS and support for Kurdish forces. However, its intervention has been characterized by inconsistency, particularly with the U.S. withdrawal from northern Syria in 2019, which left the Kurds vulnerable to Turkish military operations (Siddiqui & Muneer, 2023). While the U.S. sought to counter ISIS, it was also caught in a delicate balancing act between its allies in the region, including Saudi Arabia, Israel, and Kurdish forces, and its strategic interests in containing Iran’s influence.

Russia’s involvement in Syria, supporting the Assad regime, has fundamentally altered the regional power dynamics. Russia’s military intervention in 2015 helped to stabilize Assad’s position and shift the balance of power in favor of the Syrian government. Moscow’s influence in Syria has provided it with a foothold in the Middle East, directly challenging the interests of the U.S. and NATO. Russia’s support for Iran, which has bolstered Tehran’s influence in Syria, further complicated the regional balance, creating a triangular power struggle between Iran, Turkey, and the U.S. (Al-Masri, 2023).

Iran has played a pivotal role in supporting Assad, both militarily and financially, through its Revolutionary Guards and Shiite militias. Iran’s involvement in Syria has been framed as part of its broader strategy to secure a "land corridor" from Tehran to Beirut via Iraq and Syria, thereby increasing its influence over the Levant (Siddiqui & Muneer, 2023). The Iranian-backed forces have been crucial in bolstering the Syrian government’s position against opposition groups, further destabilizing the region by exacerbating sectarian divides.

Turkey has intervened in northern Syria, primarily aiming to secure its borders and prevent the establishment of a Kurdish autonomous region that could embolden Kurdish separatism within Turkey. This military involvement has created tensions with both the U.S. (which supports Kurdish forces in Syria) and Russia, with Turkey positioning itself as a regional power player in the conflict. Turkey’s actions have led to shifting alliances and, at times, contradictory strategies, as it navigates its relationships with NATO, the U.S., and Russia (Gul, 2023).

Impact on Regional Geopolitics

The rise of extremism in Syria has reshaped alliances and political dynamics in the Middle East. As ISIS gained territory and power, it forced neighboring countries to reassess their security policies and alliances.

The Sunni-Shia divide became more pronounced, with Saudi Arabia and other Gulf states backing various opposition groups to counter Iran’s growing influence in Syria. The Iranian-backed forces and their allies, including Hezbollah, provided significant support to Assad, while Saudi Arabia and Qatar funded and armed various rebel factions (Hassan & O’Neill, 2022). This sectarian divide has not only deepened the conflict in Syria but also contributed to the broader geopolitical tensions between Sunni-majority Gulf states and Shia-majority Iran.

The Kurdish issue has been central to the conflict’s impact on regional geopolitics. Syrian Kurdish forces, primarily the YPG (People’s Defense Units), allied with the U.S. in the fight against ISIS, but Turkey viewed these forces as an extension of the PKK, a Kurdish separatist group it has fought for decades. This dynamic has strained relations between Turkey and its NATO allies, particularly the U.S., and has led to military incursions in northern Syria by Turkey, aiming to dismantle Kurdish positions along its border (Siddiqui & Muneer, 2023).

Security Concerns and Long-Term Implications

The Syrian conflict has had profound security implications, with the continued presence of ISIS cells and the rise of new jihadist groups. While ISIS lost much of its territorial holdings, it has not been defeated entirely. The group’s remnants continue to operate in both Syria and Iraq, conducting insurgent attacks and maintaining a presence in remote areas (Al-Masri, 2023). New jihadist groups, some inspired by ISIS, have emerged, exploiting the region’s instability to recruit fighters and expand their influence. The long-term implications for regional security are dire. The persistence of extremist groups like ISIS, along with the fragmentation of Syria and Iraq, poses a continued threat to the broader Middle East. The power vacuum created by the collapse of state structures has enabled these groups to thrive, challenging efforts for political stability and peace in the region (Gul, 2023).

In conclusion, the Syrian conflict and the rise of extremism have had far-reaching consequences for the security and political stability of the Middle East. Neighboring countries such as Iraq, Lebanon, Jordan, and Turkey have faced severe spillover effects, including refugee crises, military incursions, and the rise of terrorism. Foreign interventions by global powers like the U.S., Russia, and Iran have further complicated the regional balance of power, with shifting alliances and power struggles. The long-term security concerns, including the persistence of ISIS and the emergence of new jihadist groups, underscore the ongoing instability in the region. The impact of the Syrian conflict on regional geopolitics, security, and political dynamics will continue to shape the future of the Middle East for years to come.

5. Conclusion:

The evolution of extremism in Syria has been deeply influenced by a complex interplay of domestic and international factors. The rise of groups like ISIS and Al-Qaeda in the context of Syria’s civil war has been driven by political instability, sectarian divisions, and the vacuum created by the collapse of the state’s authority. Extremist groups capitalized on the Syrian conflict, drawing foreign fighters and establishing territories across large parts of Syria and Iraq. The strategies employed by these groups have included brutal violence, the establishment of caliphates, and large-scale recruitment efforts. This phenomenon has not only reshaped the conflict within Syria but also had wide-reaching effects on the geopolitical dynamics of the Middle East and beyond. The spillover effects of extremism in Syria have had profound consequences on the regional security of neighboring countries like Iraq, Lebanon, Jordan, and Turkey. The refugee crises created by the conflict have strained social, economic, and political systems in these countries, while the unchecked flow of militants across borders has exacerbated security challenges. Countries like Iraq have faced a resurgence of ISIS cells, while Lebanon and Jordan have dealt with the destabilizing effects of Syrian refugees and cross-border terrorism. Turkey has seen both military incursions by Kurdish groups linked to Syrian militias and an influx of ISIS militants. The rise of extremism in Syria, therefore, not only destabilized Syria but significantly affected regional peace and security. The interventions by global powers, including the United States, Russia, Iran, and Turkey, have further altered the regional balance of power. These foreign interventions have often compounded the complexity of the conflict, with competing geopolitical interests leading to a multifaceted crisis. Russia and Iran have supported the Assad regime, while the U.S. and Turkey have backed opposition forces or Kurdish militias, leading to ongoing tensions. These competing foreign interventions have resulted in the fracturing of alliances and the rise of new jihadist groups that operate with relative freedom in the region.

(Author: Abdul Wasi Popalzay, PhD Scholar, in the Department of South and Central Asian Studies, at the Central University of Punjab, Bathinda, Email: abdul.wasi.popalzay[at]gmail.com)

References

• Khalid, I. (2022). US Withdrawal and Transition of Afghan Government: Implications for Afghanistan and Pakistan. Journal of Development and Social Sciences, 3(1), 184-197.
• Raz, I. G. (2023). Against all Expectations: Afghanistan-Pakistan Relations after the American Withdrawal. ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF SOCIAL AND STRATEGIC STUDIES, 4, 05-20.
• Shahab, M., Sulaiman, S., & Ullah, A. (2023). US Withdrawal from Afghanistan: Assessment of Pakistan’s Foreign Policy Options. Pakistan Journal of Society, Education and Language (PJSEL), 10(1), 195-206.
• Abdullah, R. (2022). The rise of ISIS in Syria: Factors and implications. Middle East Review, 45(1), 122-145.
• Ahmed, M. (2024). Sectarian tensions in the Middle East: The role of ISIS and its aftermath. Journal of Middle Eastern Politics, 39(3), 255-276.
• Al-Masri, Y. (2023). Iran’s influence in Syria and the emergence of extremism. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 34(4), 84-105.
• Gul, H. (2023). The evolution of HTS and its role in Syria. Conflict Studies Journal, 30(2), 201-222.
• Khaldun, A. (2022). The geopolitics of extremism in the Syrian Civil War. Global Politics Journal, 58(4), 305-326.
• Mozaffar, H. (2023). Local grievances and the rise of extremism in Syria. Journal of Middle Eastern Development, 11(2), 67-83.
• Siddiqui, M., & Muneer, F. (2023). Foreign interventions and the Syrian conflict: Implications for extremism. International Affairs Review, 12(1), 18-33.
• Wehrey, F. (2024). Middle Eastern governance and the rise of extremism. World Politics Review, 22(3), 134-156.
• Zayd, A. (2023). The Syrian civil war and the rise of jihadist movements. Middle East Studies, 16(1), 49-68.
• Abdullah, R. (2022). The rise of ISIS in Syria: Factors and implications. Middle East Review, 45(1), 122-145.
• Al-Masri, Y. (2023). Iran’s influence in Syria and the emergence of extremism. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 34(4), 84-105.
• Gul, H. (2023). The evolution of HTS and its role in Syria. Conflict Studies Journal, 30(2), 201-222.
• Hassan, A., & O’Neill, P. (2022). The military strategies of ISIS: A case study. Global Conflict Review, 17(3), 50-72.
• Siddiqui, M., & Muneer, F. (2023). Foreign interventions and the Syrian conflict: Implications for extremism. International Affairs Review, 12(1), 18-33.
• Zayd, A. (2023). The Syrian civil war and the rise of jihadist movements. Middle East Studies, 16(1), 49-68.
• Al-Masri, Y. (2023). Iran’s influence in Syria and the emergence of extremism. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 34(4), 84-105.
• Gul, H. (2023). The evolution of HTS and its role in Syria. Conflict Studies Journal, 30(2), 201-222.
• Hassan, A., & O’Neill, P. (2022). The military strategies of ISIS: A case study. Global Conflict Review, 17(3), 50-72.
• Siddiqui, M., & Muneer, F. (2023). Foreign interventions and the Syrian conflict: Implications for extremism. International Affairs Review, 12(1), 18-33.